Article About Nuclear
Nuclear energy is one of the many natural resources that we know how to turn into heat and electricity. It is, by far, the most energy-dense of all these natural resources, meaning we can extract more heat and electricity from a given amount of it than from an equivalent amount of anything else. As an example, consider a chunk of coal and chunk of natural (unenriched) uranium, both weighing the same (1 kg) and both mined and isolated straight out of the earth. If we could suck all the energy out of the coal, it would run a 100W light-bulb for about 4 days. With the uranium, we could run the bulb for about 180 years. That’s just using the good kind of uranium, too. If we used a fast reactor and sucked all the energy from the not-so-good atoms in the same block of uranium, the light bulb could burn for 24,000 years. This kind of energy density eliminates huge amounts of the environmental footprint required to use less dense fuels, such as huge coal mines, massive gas and oil fields, trainloads of fuel shipments, and expansive wind or solar farms. Oh, and nuclear reactors do this all without releasing any pollutants into the environment.
Article About Nuclear from Greenpeace
Nuclear Transports Recklessy Endanger Pacific States
An accident or attack on a nuclear transport at sea could have catastrophic consequences for coastal states, and yet the British and Japanese governments have refused to consult with countries along the route, not even concerning plans for emergencies or liability agreements in the case of radioactive contamination.
This blatant disregard of the wishes of Pacific states and international law of the sea demonstrates the absurd and dangerous lengths to which the Japanese and British governments are willing to go to prop up this dangerous, polluting industry. The irony is that cleaner renewable energy could put an end to the need for nuclear power but these governments in particular have yet to see the light.
The ships are close to Rennel Island within the Solomon’s EEZ and Torres Island and Espiritu Santo within the Vanuatu EEZ. This puts the ships on a course to transit through the EEZ of the Pacific Island of New Caledonia.
British Nuclear Fuels (BNFL) has ludicrously called us irresponsible for publicising the location of this dangerous shipment. It is they who are avoiding their responsibility says Angenette Heffernan, Greenpeace nuclear campaigner.
“Under international law, BNFL is required to inform nations that they are in their waters, and it was their irresponsibility in falsifying crucial safety data which is bringing this shipment through the region twice unnecessarily,” said Angenette.
The Vanuatu Deputy Prime Minister Serge Vohor has accused Japan and Britain of disrespecting his country’s sovereignty.
Each nation has the right to protect the marine environment within its EEZ from hazardous nuclear shipments under the Law of the Sea Convention. The shipping states have not fulfilled their obligations under the international Law of the Sea, which includes consulting with en route states. Therefore the BNFL ships, the Pacific Pintail and the Pacific Teal have jeopardised their right to “freedom of navigation” within EEZs.
Protesters are setting sail from around the Pacific to form a Nuclear Free Pacific Flotilla in the Tasman Sea. These protesters share a common concern about the dangers posed by British Nuclear Fuel’s shipment of weapons-usable plutonium past their countries, and they are determined to ensure it never happens again.
You can take action today to oppose the nuclear transport. Join the virtual flotilla.
Find out more about the flotilla participants at the Nuclear Free Seas Flotilla website.
Visit Greenpeace’s Stop Plutonium Terror website to learn more about the plutonium shipment.
Video About Nuclear and Destroying Earth
(especially in japan)